January 19, 2008
January 17, 2008
Why Nothing Will Change
SPIEGEL: The next US president could be a Democrat. The front-runners have
already stated they would change their political course with Pakistan. Hillary
Clinton wants to impose American controls on Pakistan's nuclear arsenal, and
Barack Obama would like to send American troops to fight extremists in your
country ...
Musharraf: ... (laughs, shakes his head) ...
SPIEGEL: ... they
also might cut back military and economic aid to Pakistan, which has amounted to
more than $10 billion since 2001. Have the Democratic front-runners contacted
you already?
Musharraf: All these politicians you have mentioned and who talk
that way do not have access to intelligence information that could provide them
with an accurate view of the situation. When these people get access to that
kind of intelligence, I am sure they will not take a different approach than
their predecessor. Why would they want to do something to destabilize us, a
nuclear power? They will not act against their own national interest.I wonder if this is bluff or pure thruth from a realistic point of view. Time will surely tell.
Lieutnant Columbo?
Obama said he wasn't thinking of the president's job as the guy who runs a bureucracy and Clinton seemed to disagree.
At first I was thinking, this guy just blew it. Why does he say he doesn't pay attention to details and doesn't want to be the "
Then, I listened and read what people were saying and most out there are bashing Clinton saying she is trying to see the devil in everything. They are praising Obama for his sincerity, also mentioning his success as a community organiser. When it comes down to it people see Obama as the leader and Sen. Clinton the manager.
I am not endorsing any candidate but I tought it was interesting that the popular opinion was more analytical than my own and wanted to express it.
Nonetheless, even if you think the guy is "llikeable" we must be careful in analyzing his policies and keep in mind that he is a democrat!
Today in France, Total which is one of the biggest oil firm was pronounced guilty over the spill of oil caused by the Erika in 1999. This is an important decision because it is the first time that a French court puts such a responsibility in the hand of the affreting company. Now, with the lobbying of environmental group there is a legal framework when it comes to messingg with the environment in France. Altough you pitifully can't have a smoke in public anymore in Marseille or Lyon their gas prices are still lower than in the US!
January 14, 2008
“Francafrique, Aid, and Neocolonialism: The smartest African dictatorial mantra”
Although Houphouët-Boigny was the creator, the individual who first took on a negative approach and aided to the connotation we currently have for the word Francafrique was Mr. François-Xavier Verschave. Mr. Verschave was a French economist who described the Francafrique as “the secret criminality in the upper echelons of French politics and economy, where a kind of underground Republic is hidden from view”. To the point, what he meant was, French governmental executives intentionally employed the good relationship existing with the former colonies to satisfy not only the interest of their nation but also their personal interest, at the exponential detriment of Africa and in concert with its transvestite “leaders”. In his point of view, Africa was used as a cow drained of its milk while it was lured with not-so-fresh grass. Mr. Verschave made a lot of noise and won the trust and acceptance of numerous – non-thinking, externationalist – observers.
I certainly do not claim a complete French innocence – or that of other Western powers for that matter. However, Mr. Verschave was wrong, terribly wrong. He was so wrong that the repercussions of his claim may be the cause of a disaster en cours in Africa. I highly doubt the man was a malicious individual who purposely did what he did. I reverently respect his effort denouncing what is known as the Foccart Network and try to open the very-well-closed eyes of African leaders. It failed. It failed because moronic dictators are agile in evading any threat to their kingship and hegemony over their countries’ resources.
These leaders emerged victorious when talking about the concept of Francafrique. They found a way to blame colonization, western imperialism, arbitrary delimitations of frontiers, slavery, unjust economic systems, Western inferences in internal affairs recently, and everything else you might think of. Let’s face it, decades after the slave trade, decades after the colonization, we allow African despots to conceal their failures by partaking in a guilt game?
The African problem is one that involve bloodthirsty military individuals (e.g. General Samuel Doe, General Guei Robert, General Mobutu Sese Seko, General Abacha, General Siad Barre General Moussa Traore) capturing power, indebting their countries and depositing amounts of money greater than their entire countries’ debt into Swiss bank account.
The African problem is one where promising African intellectual burgeoning with revolutionary ideas succumb to corruption after rising to power- Laurent Gbagbo? John Kufuor? Thabo M’Beki? Abdoulaye Wade?
The African problem is a problem of fleeing brains. Successful African abroad accept to be psychologically expatriated, to force a cultural adaptation in the North, live “comfortable” lives in suburban neighborhoods in Paris, London, or Washington DC. Have monetary gains taken a toll on African scruples? Have Mercedes taken a toll on African identities? Has the cold and the snow taken a toll on African consciences?
The African Problem is one where so-called presidents stand up at the United Nations tribune to beg for aid from other countries. They do so while hinting on slavery, mentioning colonization, alluding the fault to every one else but themselves who are leading– or at least are supposed to lead– their nations. It is good to keep in mind the enormous richness of the continent, mineral resources abound, natural resources are plenty, even oil; the new gold is profusely existent. The aid attributed to African countries, if taken into reasonable account would have surely sufficed to respectably straighten African economies.
The African solution is just that, an African Solution. No Westerner– or Easterner as it seems relevant now– will ever want to solve Africa’s problem; and that without involving benefits for his own country or continent. China for example, is a threat to a successful African reformation. Who do you think benefits from the crisis in Darfur? Is it Sudan for its plethora of weapons and dead bodies or China from the Sudanese oil?
The African Solution is to refuse sending aid to Africa. Encouraging private investments and entrepreneurial undertakings would produce more dividends for the continent. Donor countries must adopt a policy of rewarding democratic countries–only; an area where those countries are profoundly guilty. They must stop at once to deal with African problems in terms of nation to individual i.e. conversing with African politicians as respectable individuals who will channel benefits to their population; rather a nation to populations approach should be developed.
The African Solution is for the West to stop taking self-conscious, apologetic, culpable, and over compassionate stances when it comes to AIDS. AIDS is perhaps the most pressing danger to Africa’s renaissance. It is decimating the African Human Capital at an incontrollable velocity. Yet, all of the most affected countries do not seem to find it necessary to take critical decisions to halt the spread of the pandemic. Rather, South Africa who is one of the most–if not the most– affected African nation, decided to buy military equipments and conduct experiments. I have to guess this endeavor was carried out in order to scare off its many inexistent enemies. Back to the point, Western corporations must stop infantilizing incompetent governments. It is not responsible to use arguments as “we are poor therefore; provide us with treatments at cost prices”. It is irresponsible for two reasons: First, treating the affected individuals when there is no cure is not a viable solution on the long term scale; rather emphasis should be on prevention and education. Second, there is an inexistent support to administer these drugs. The health care facilities need to be upgraded in order to be able to appropriately dispense the treatments.
Africa is not poor and we must remember that at all times. Culturally, colonization did not bring to Africa, virtually, any new form of modernization. Africans had democracies, parliamentary institutions and procedures, currency, markets, all according to culturally working African precepts. let’s have the courage not to be duped by obtuse, self-adulating sycophants.
“In Africa it’s the blind leading the clueless” – Dr. George B.N. Ayittey
January 13, 2008
Now; You can't vote
Madeleine Albright (surprinsingly to me) has undertaken to delineate in 10 points what the next president should do. I appreciated a couple of those advices. Especially, when she urges the next prez to distance himself from the notion of "Islamic terrorism" since, according to her, Islam does not condone terrorism. She also mentions the shame that is Guantanamo and reminds the president to bear in mind his own Humanity and thus the possibility to make mistakes. Could have been useful to Bush- I think.
Well, read it for yourself.
January 12, 2008
From Hillaryland
January 11, 2008
Thou shall not lie
Taiwan = China
January 10, 2008
Rounding Up the World
The new Darfur force has been deployed but already warning of its shortcomings are being expressed. I think we are on the way to witness somalia over again when the International Community can not decide once for all to end a conflict, seriously.
The UN announced today its prediction that the world's economy could slow down due to the fear of recession in the U.S. Personnally I don't buy the whole recession thing. Most will disagree.
Ethnic tensions in the DR. Congo are resurfacing again and again. Now when it comes from the DR Congo, we need to pay attention. The fight between the Congolese army and the Tutsi rebels of N'Kunda could escalate rapidly.
Clara Rojas and Consuelo Gonzalez have finally been released today after the semi-failure of Chavez earlier on. Altough, we have a reason to celebrate, let's not forget the hundred remaining Farc hostages
Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan announced he will meet with French and German leaders Sarkozy and Merkel probably during the first half of 2008. They will discuss Turkey's bid to join the European Union. French and German authorities have been fervent opposants, claiming Turkey's religious discrepancy with the rest of Europe.
On the way to MI and SC John Kerry endorsed Obama. Edwards declared that he respected Kerry's choice. I predict a Obama-Edwards ticket if Hillary proves to be a tougher opponent to Obama. Also, my insiders on the campaign trail are saying that there may be a deal between the two candidates. If one was falling way behind, he would join the other in order to destroy Hillary Clinton. We'll see.
Victory for second ammendment proponents. The court of Appeal of San Francisco overturned the Gun Ban. (it's under Feinstein)
Also, tomorow it is anticipated that student of Georgia State will be allowed to carry concealed weapons on campus. Proponents argue, if you don't know whether individuals have weapons You won't try to shoot people around. I like guns, it's like a mini superpower, so for whatever reason they may advance, let me shoot first!